［4］井涛.经济法责任的独立性探讨［J］.华东政法学院学报,2004,(1):107. ［5］李昌麒.经济法学［M］.北京:中国政法大学出版社,1997:89. ［6］刘瑞复.经济法学原理［M］.北京:北京大学出版社,2000:161. ［7］石少侠
［4］井涛.经济法责任的独立性探讨［J］.华东政法学院学报,2004,(1):107.
［5］李昌麒.经济法学［M］.北京:中国政法大学出版社,1997:89.
［6］刘瑞复.经济法学原理［M］.北京:北京大学出版社,2000:161.
［7］石少侠.经济法新论［M］.吉林:吉林大学出版社,1996:56.
［8］潘静成，刘文华.经济法基础理论教程［M］.北京:高等教育出版社,1994:330.
［9］漆多俊.经济法基础理论［M］.武汉:武汉大学出版社,2000:190.
［10］戴凤岐，李新新，金晓晨.经济法［M］.修订本.北京:经济科学出版社,1996:96.
［11］党宪中.经济责任质疑［J］.政治与法律,1990,(6):53-54.
［12］丁邦开.中国现代经济法［M］.南京:东南大学出版社,1992:38.
［13］翟继光.论经济法责任的独立性［J］.当代法学,2004,(4):50-51.
［14］邓峰.论经济法上的责任——公共责任与财务责任的融合［J］.中国人民大学学报,2003,(3):151.
［15］杨德敏.经济法责任独立性探讨［J］.河北法学,2005,(3):159.
［16］张守文.经济法责任理论之拓扑［J］.中国法学,2003,(4):14.
［17］翟继光.经济法责任研究［G］//王先林.安徽大学法律评论.合肥:安徽大学出版社,2003，2（2）：19.
［18］薛克鹏.经济法综合责任论质疑［J］.政法论坛(中国政法大学学报),2005,(4):178-182.
［19］钟雯彬.经济法律责任社会性研究［J］.四川大学学报:哲学社会科学版,2004,(1):94.
［20］吕忠梅.经济法律责任论［J］.法商研究,1998(4):22.
［21］刘水林.经济法责任体系的二元结构及二重性［J］.政法论坛(中国政法大学学报),2005,(2):98-99.
［22］王利明.惩罚性赔偿研究［J］.中国社会科学,2000,(4):114-116.
［23］崔全旭，郭凯峰.产品召回制度的经济法思考［J］.产业与科技论坛,2010,(2):133.
［24］李昌麒.经济法学［M］.北京:法律出版社,2007:210.
［25］夏雅丽.公司社会责任内涵研究［J］.经济学家,2010,(4):103-104.
［26］张维迎.市场的逻辑［M］.上海:上海人民出版社,2010:36.
［27］蒋建湘.企业社会责任的性质［J］.政法论坛,2010,(1):103.
［28］卢代富.企业所得税法关于公益性捐赠税前扣除规定研究［J］.现代经济探讨,2009,(3):18-19.
［29］颜运秋.经济法责任基本问题研究［J］.山东警察学院学报,2010,(3):58.
［30］许明月.经济法学术研究定位的反思［J］.政法论坛,2006,(6):23.
Controversy and Dilemma: Legal Liability in Economic Law
DENG Gang
(Southwest University of Political Science and Law, Chongqing 401120, China)
Abstract:
More than twenty years has slipped by since the topic of legal liability was studied in the economic law area. Based on the general theory of legal liability, a variety of doctrines have been developed. However, there still exist arguments about the designation and separateness of the legal liability adopted in economic law whereas certain consensus has been reached on the features of the legal liability. As for the modes of specific liabilities, while inheriting directly and indirectly the traditional legal liabilities, economic law exhibits some unique obligatory features in the aspects of corporate social liability, defective product recall, punitive damages, and corrective advertising remedy. The controversy and dilemma concerning the study indicate a universal conflict in the field of terminology between economic law and other laws. Thus the effortless researching approach of adding “economy” or “economic” to traditional terms seems worthy of reconsidering.
Key Words: economic law; legal liability; research review
(责任编辑：南粤论文中心)转贴于南粤论文中心: http://www.nylw.net(南粤论文中心__代写代发论文_毕业论文带写_广州职称论文代发_广州论文网）
顶一下
(0)
0%
踩一下
(0)
0%
版权声明：因本文均来自于网络，如果有版权方面侵犯,请及时联系本站删除.
