[3]Giorgio D G, Noia D C,Piatti L. Financial market regulation: the case of Italy and a proposal for the Euro Area[R]. The working paper of the Wharton Financial Institutional Center, 2000,No.24.
　　[4]La Porta R, Lopez-de-Silanes F, Shleifer A, et al. Law of finance[J].Journal of Political Economy,1998,106:1133-1155.
　　[5]La Porta R, Lopez-de-Silanes F, Shleifer A, et al. What works in security laws?[J].Journal of Finance,2006, 61:1-33.
　　[6]张育军.中国证券市场监管能力与监管效率的分析[J].证券市场导报,2003(7):4-14.
　　[7]沈艺峰,许年行,杨熠.我国中小投资者法律保护历史实践的实证研究[J].经济研究,2004(9):90-100.
　　[8]陈工孟,高宁.我国证券监管有效性的实证研究[J].管理世界,2005(7):40-47.
　　[9]陈国进,赵向琴,林辉.上市公司违法违规处罚和投资者利益保护效果[J].财经研究,2005(8):48-58.
　[10]张宗新,朱伟骅. 证券监管、执法效率与投资者保护——基于国际经验的一种实证分析[J].财贸经济,2007(11):3-9.
　　[11]巴曙松. 金融消费者保护：全球金融监管改革重点[J].资本市场, 2010(5):56-58.
　　[12]李扬,胡滨.金融危机背景下全球金融监管改革[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2011:41-53.
　　[13]张杰.中国金融制度的结构与变迁[M].太原:山西经济出版社,1998:102-105.
　　[14]奥尔森.集体行动的逻辑[M].上海:三联书店,1995:58-62.
　　[15]于春敏.消费者保护乃金融监管首要价值基础——美国金融消费者保护之困局[J].财经科学,2010(6):17-24.
　　[16]赫希曼 O A.转变参与——私人利益与公共行动[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2008:79-80.
　　[17]唐国正，熊德华，巫和懋.股权分置改革中的投资者保护与投资者理性[J].金融研究,2005(9):137-154.
　　[18]吴超鹏,郑方镳,林周勇,等.对价支付影响因素的理论和实证分析[J].经济研究,2006(8):14-23.
　　[19]赵俊强，廖士光，李湛.中国上市公司股权分置改革中的利益分配研究[J].经济研究,2006(11):112-122.
　　[20]姚颐,刘志远,王健.股权分置改革、机构投资者与投资者保护[J].金融研究,2007(11):45-56.
　　[21]沈伯平．论中国股票市场规制体系的制度性缺陷及其化解[J]．经济问题探索,2009(3):67-70.
　　[22]王建中，张莉.投资者法律保护与公司融资的配置效率[J].南京审计学院学报,2008(4):25-28.
　　[23]廖理,汪韧,陈璐.探求智慧之旅——哈佛、麻省理工著名经济学家访谈录[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2000:37-50.
　　 [责任编辑：杨凤春]
　　The Choice of the Object of China Security Market Regulation during Transitional Period
　　Shen Boping
　　Abstract: The idea of making the security market acted as financing state-owned enterprises, thus accelerating economy growth isn’t compliant with the economy development, the regulators must transfer to investor protection which is the core object of security market regulation and promote China security market to develop constantly and sustainably. Investor protection is the core object of security market government regulation. The institutional foundation of the absence of the mechanism of investor protection in China security market is that the government acts as three roles at the same time: the actual or varietal ultimate owner of the state-owned listed company，stock exchange and security company; the protector of investor’s interest and the regulator and supervisor of the stock market.
　　Keyword: Investor protection; stock market regulation; the choice of the objects; transitional period; government regulation
 

(责任编辑：南粤论文中心)转贴于南粤论文中心: http://www.nylw.net(南粤论文中心__代写代发论文_毕业论文带写_广州职称论文代发_广州论文网）